Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the status of faculty wellness in terms of the eight dimensions of wellness such as emotional, environmental, financial, intellectual, occupational, physical, social, and spiritual. Also, the challenges encountered by the faculty on the eight dimensions of wellness during the new normal time. The mixed methods of research were utilized, the constructed and validated questionnaire were responded by 277 faculty members of the HEI and ten randomly selected faculty members were interviewed. The results reveal that the physical wellness got the rating of occasionally while the other seven wellness got the rating of frequently, which implies that majority of the faculty were frequently practicing or doing the item descriptions of the eight dimensions of wellness. For the challenges encountered, the findings show that the spiritual challenge had a rating of seldom while the other ten challenges got the rating of sometimes, which means that the faculty encountered most of the challenges on the other seven dimensions of wellness, and the ranked first three were physical, occupational, and social. The results of the interview present the faculty’s good and not that good experiences with coping mechanisms during the new normal time. The researchers concluded that the status of the eight dimensions of faculty wellness should always be checked and monitored to maintain a smart, healthy, and responsive faculty. Eight personal and professional development programs were proposed to maintain and enhance the faculty wellness of the faculty in the HEI.

Article Details

How to Cite
Geronimo, C. A., Inasoria, R. D., Geronimo, A. L., Geronimo, D. G. G., & Esguerra, R. C. (2023). Faculty Wellness of a Higher Education Institution in the New Normal Time: Basis for the Personal and Professional Development Program. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(3), 917-935. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.03.23

References

Bandura, Albert (1986). The Social Cognitive Theory. https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu
Prochaska and DiClemente in the late (1970). The Trans-theoretical Model (Stages of Change). https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu
Montoya, Angel & Summers, Laura Lee (February 2021). 8 Dimensions of Wellness for Educators. The Learning Professional Association, 52-53
Pennebaker, J. (1997). Writing about emotional experi-ences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Sci-ence, 8(3), 162-166
Sackney, L., Noonan, B., & Miller, C.M. (2000). Leader-ship for educator wellness: An exploratory study. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3, 41-56.
Strout, K.A. & Howard, E.P. (2012). The six dimensions of wellness: Cognition in aging adults. Journal of Ho-listic Nursing, 30, 195-204.
Zurawik, M. (2020). Moving through spa---ces – leisure walking and its psychosocial benefits for well-being: A narrative review. Human Movement, 21(2), 1-8.
Dr. Cynthia Bautista, Dr. Patricia Arinto, Dr. Dina Ocam-po, and CHED Chair Prosperous De Vera (2021). Commission on Higher Education. https://ched.gov.ph/
Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerg-ing Infectious Diseases. https://iatf.doh.gov.ph/
ASEAN University Network. https://www.aunsec.org/
Moralista, Rome B., Oducado, Ryan Michael F., (Septem-ber 2020). Faculty Perception toward Online Edu-cation in a State College in the Philippines during the Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) Pandemic, p.5