Main Article Content
Abstract
During Covid 19 pandemic, poverty is tremendously raising and expanding across the country, worsened the economic sector in almost every region in Indonesia, including in Semarang, Central Java. According to the number of residents living in Semarang, 79,058 people experienced an economic weakening in 2021. Based on the problem above, it can be concluded that there is a need for a community empowerment strategy model that is appropriate to market needs. This study reveals the implementation of a strategy model for empowering the urban poor based on market needs in the non-formal education carried out by BBPLK Semarang. This study uses a qualitative approach. The subjects of the research were 5 trainees and instructors. The technique of data collection was done by interview, observation, and documentation. To test the validity of the data, this study used technical triangulation. Data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative. This process put 3 activities, namely, (1) data reduction, (2) data presentation, and (3) drawing conclusions or verification. The community empowerment model implemented at BBPLK uses a strategy model for empowering the urban poor based on market needs. The stages of community empowerment are carried out through the awareness stage, the skill transformation stage, and the intellectual and innovative ability improvement stage. A common obstacle that occurs in BBPLK Semarang is the lack of instructors. BBPLK Semarang is still not being able to hold their instructors, so they need help from other parties such as a Private vocational training center in Semarang. Moreover, the most influential factor is the intention of the training participants themselves and the people who are reluctant to follow the training at BBPLK Semarang.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Asshiddiq.S, M. F. (2016). Analisis efektivitas UPDTD Balai Latihan Kerja (BLK) Disnaker Kota Semarang dalam meningkatkan keterampilan masyarkat Kota Semarang. 1–15. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/209350-analisis-efektivitas-uptd-balai-latihan.pdf
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2011). Qualitative Methods for the Social Sciences.
Chaudhuri, S. (2015). Urban poor, economic opportunities, and sustainable development through traditional knowledge and practices. Global Bioethics, 26(2), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2015.1037141
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research : planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Creswell, J. W., & J. David, C. (2013). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Fifth Edition. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Creswell, W. J. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach, 4th edition. New Delhi, India: Sage Publication.
Fachul Nur Rohmah*, Sonhaji, S. (2017). Analisa yuridis terhadap fungsi dan peran Balai Besar Pengembangan Latihan Kerja ( BBPLK ) Semarang dalam meningkatkan kualitas tenaga kerja di Kota Semarang. Diponegoro Law Journal, 6, 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/
Faizal, F. (2015). Diskursus Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Ijtimaiyya, 8(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijpmi.v8i1.861
Farrelly, S. G., & Daniels, E. (2014). Understanding Alternative Education: A Mixed Methods Examination of Student Experiences. Education Leadership Review of Doctoral Research, 1(1), 106–121.
Hermiyanty, Wandira Ayu Bertin, D. S. (2017). Literasi Budaya dan Kewargaan. Gerakan Literasi Nasional, 8(9), 1–58.
Hidayat, D. (2020). TEKNIK IDENTIFIKASI KEBUTUHAN BELAJAR BERBASIS Jurnal Comm-Edu. Jurnal Comn-Edu, 3(2), 156–166.
Hrmo, R., Miština, J., & Krištofiaková, L. (2016). Improving the Quality of Technical and Vocational Education in Slovakia for European Labour Market Needs. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 6(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v6i2.5369
Huberman, M. B. M. and A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edit). United Kingdom: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Laverack, G. (2006). Using a “domains” approach to build community empowerment. Community Development Journal, 41(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi038
Lawrence, K. (1999). Regional community ‘empowerment’ and the competitive training market. Policy, Organisation, and Society, 17(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349952.1999.11876701
Lucia Hartiningtyas, M., & Indarto. (2017). MODEL PENGUATAN KESIAPAN KERJA LULUSAN ( Studi Pada BBPLK Semarang ). Journal Universitas Semarang, 148, 148–162.
Mulyono, S. E., Sutarto, J., Malik, A., & Loretha, A. F. (2020). Community empowerment in entrepreneurship development based on local potential. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 11(2), 271–283.
Noor, F. (2004). PELATIHAN BERDASAR ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN DIKLAT. Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Standar Pelayanan Terpadu Bagi Lemdiklat Jurusan Pendidikan Teknik Elektro FT UNY, 1–10.
Nugroho, D. (2013). Implementasi Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Melalui Pelatihan Keterampilan Dasar (Studi Di Kecamatan Tambaksari Kota Surabaya). Jurnal Administrasi Publik Mahasiswa Universitas Brawijaya, 1(5), 862–871.
Rebullida, M. L. G. (2003). The politics of urban poor housing: State and civil society dynamics. Philippine Political Science Journal, 24(47), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2003.9754247
Sahid Ullah, M. (2016). Empowering rural communities through telecentre connectivity: experience of the Union Information and Service Centres in Bangladesh. Media Asia, 43(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2016.1205834
Sumini. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Pelatihan Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Hasil Pelatihan di Balai Latihan Kerja. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, (April), 75–86.
Wahyu, S. (2013). M O D U L MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN NONFORMAL Oleh. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004