Main Article Content
Abstract
This systematic literature review examines the effectiveness of Grammarly as an Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tool for improving the writing skills of English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. Drawing on 10 studies published between 2018 and 2024, the review assesses Grammarly’s key features, benefits, and limitations. Results show that Grammarly significantly reduces grammatical errors, enhances students’ writing confidence, and fosters autonomous learning. However, challenges such as over-reliance on the tool and its limited capacity to provide comprehensive feedback on higher-order writing skills remain. The review underscores the need for further research into Grammarly’s long-term effects on writing development, particularly its efficacy across various academic disciplines and contexts.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Armstrong, R., Hall, B., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review. Journal of public health, 33(1), 147-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
Clarke, J. (2011). What is a systematic review?. Evidence Based Nursing, 14, 64 - 64. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.2011.0049.
Dewi, U. (2023). Grammarly as Automated Writing Evaluation: Its Effectiveness from EFL Students’ Perceptions. Lingua Cultu-ra. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315.
Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. (2021b). Examining the impact of Grammarly on the quality of mobile L2 writing. The JALT CALL Jour-nal, 17(2), 74–92. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n2.336
Fahmi, S., & Rachmijati, C. (2021). Improving Students’ Writing Skill Using Grammaly Application for Second Grade in Senior High School. Project (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i1.p69-74
Faisal, F., & Carabella, P. (2023). Utilizing Grammarly in an Academic Writing Pro-cess: Higher-Education Students’ Per-ceived Views. Journal of English Lan-guage Teaching and Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v8i1.1006
Fan, N. (2023). Exploring the effects of auto-mated written corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing quality: A Mixed-Methods Study. SAGE Open, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181296
Fitria, T. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English Writing Assistant: Students’ Al-ternative for Writing English. The Journal of English Language and Literature, 5, 65-78. https://doi.org/10.31002/METATHESIS.V5I1.3519.
Ghufron, M. A., & Rosyida, F. (2018). The role of Grammarly in Assessing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing. Lingua Cultura, 12(4), 395. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v12i4.4582
Guba, M. N. A., Awad, A., & Qub’a, A. A. (2024). Grammarly in Teaching Writing to EFL Learners at Low Levels: How Useful Is It? World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p1
Hadiat, A. (2022). THE USE OF GRAMMARLY TO ENHANCE STUDENTS' ACCURACY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT. Journal of English Education Program (JEEP). https://doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v9i2.8552.
Huang, H., Li, Z., & Taylor, L. (2020). The Effec-tiveness of Using Grammarly to Improve Students' Writing Skills. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Dis-tance Education and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402569.3402594.
Krupinski, E. (2019). Writing Systematic Re-views of the Literature—It Really Is a Systematic Process!. Journal of Digital Imaging, 32, 199-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-00176-x.
Maulidina, P., & Wibowo, H. (2022). THE USE OF GRAMMARLY TOOLS TO ENRICH STUDENT’S WRITING ABILITY. Lingua, 18(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.34005/lingua.v18i2.2246
Miranty, D., Widiati, U., Cahyono, B. Y., & Sha-rif, T. I. S. T. (2021). The effectiveness of using grammarly in teaching writing among Indonesian undergraduate EFL students. Advances in Social Science, Edu-cation and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211212.008
Prasetya, R. E., & Raharjo, D. H. (2023). En-hancing English Language writing skills: An evaluation of the efficacy of gram-marly application. Journal of English Language Studies, 8(2), 320. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v8i2.19294
Puri, N. G., & Setiamunadi, A. A. (2023). The use of grammarly by tertiary English lan-guage learners in their online writing classes. English Education : Journal of English Teaching and Research, 8(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v8i2.20981
Raskova, L. (2023). Integrating Grammarly Tools to Enhance Writing Efficiency in Senior High School. Jadila: Journal of De-velopment and Innovation in Language and Literature Education. https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v3i1.389.
Sajjadpour, N. (2021). How Grammarly® Website Influences the Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Performance. Lan-guage Teaching Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.22.09.
Setyani, E. D., Bunau, E., & Rezeki, Y. S. (2023). The Influence of Grammarly towards In-donesian EFL Students’ First-Degree The-sis Writing Confidence. Elsya, 5(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i1.6773
Syafi’i, A. (2020). Grammarly: an online EFL writing companion. Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguis-tics, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31316/eltics.v5i2.912
Williams, R. I., Clark, L. A., Clark, W. R., & Raf-fo, D. M. (2021). Re-examining systematic literature review in management re-search: Additional benefits and execution protocols. European Management Jour-nal, 39(4), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.09.007